Skip to main content
· 3/22/1983

Brayton v. Ostrau

Citations

  • 561 F. Supp. 156
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A Section 14 action based on an alleged material misrepresentation or omission in proxy materials ... should be sustained only when it challenges a transaction which was the subject of the proxy materials, such as approval of a merger agreement or the election of corporate directors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.