State v. Hall
Citations
- 16 S.D. 6
- 65 L.R.A. 151
- 91 N.W. 325
- 1902 S.D. LEXIS 71
Syllabus
<p>1. Defendant, accused of murder, moved for change of venue, on affidavits alleging that on a previous trial he was convicted after groat difficulty-in obtaining a jury, that the murder and trial had been extensively published, in the county, that many of the citizens had viewed the remains of the deceased, and that there was a strong- prejudice against defendant throughout the county, so that an impartial jury could not be obtained. The application was opposed by affidavits of 100 citizens, many of whom affirmed that they had not heard the case commented on, and had no prejudice, and could sit impartially as jurors; that neither defendant nor deceased was a resident of the county: and. all affirmed that there was no prejudice, and, in their opinion, a fair and impartial trial could be had. Comp. Laws, § 7312, provides that a criminal action may be removed when it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in' the county. Held, no abuse of discretion to deny the change.</p> <p>2. Under Comp. Laws, § 7313, providing that the panel of jurors summoned. on a special venire may bo challenged on account of any bias of the officer who summoned them, which would be good ground of challenge to a jur’or, and section 7358, subd. 2, giving- as ground of challenge of a juror the existence of a state of mind which satisfies the court that the juror cannot try the issue impartially, the overruling of a challenge to the panel of jurors as summoned by an officer who heard the former trial, at which defendant was convicted of murder,, and then formed an opinion as to his guilt, but who had not expressed such opinion, and did not discuss the case with any of tlio jurors summoned, and who testified that, if called as a juror, he could try the case impartially, was not error.</p> <p>3. On prosecution for murder, a witness testified that he saw defendant write his name on two exhibits which contained no matter material to the case, and t
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KingstonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-02-10· cited 22×
- Branch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-12-19· cited 17×
- State v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 17×
- State v. WinchesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-11-05· cited 11×
- State v. CallahanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1904-06-08· cited 5×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moon's Adm'r v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama· 1882-12-15· cited 47×
- State v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1890-12-18· cited 23×
- Haugen v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1892-12-08· cited 13×
- State v. BillingsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1889-05-14· cited 13×
- State v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1894-01-24· cited 12×
- State v. La CroixSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1896-04-07· cited 11×
- National Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-11-12· cited 5×
- State v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-12-31· cited 3×
- Long v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-10-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.