Skip to main content
· 3/30/1976

United States v. Richard Harrison Russell

Citations

  • 532 F.2d 1063
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the potential for a misidentification where observation was made “at a time of stress or excitement”
  • finding no error of misidentification where witness selected photograph she believed to be the robber before suggestive comment was made
  • finding “great potential for misidentification” where “the observation was made at a time of stress or excitement”
  • finding “great potential for misidentification” where “the observation was made at a time of stress or excitement”
  • “There is great potential for misidentification when a witness identifies a stranger based solely upon a single brief observation.”
  • “There is great potential for misidentification when a witness identifies a stranger based solely upon a single brief observation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Peck, McCree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.