Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/7/1989
Bradley v. State
Citations
- 559 A.2d 1234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding statements made without Miranda warnings to director of pre-release services at department of corrections in jail regarding possible parole violation were inadmissible in prosecutor’s case and deemed subject of custodial interrogation
- finding statements made without Miranda warnings to director of prerelease services at department of corrections in jail regarding possible parole violation were inadmissible in prosecutor’s case and deemed subject of custodial interrogation
- no prejudice where prosecutor in good faith obtained results of defendant’s polygraph test which were never admitted into evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Horsey, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. AllsNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-12-21· cited 69×
- Outten v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-12-23· cited 42×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-04-14· cited 36×
- State v. SallisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-01-21· cited 32×
- Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-04-14· cited 32×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2013-09-25· cited 31×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-08-11· cited 28×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-01-17· cited 23×
- Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-06-01· cited 18×
- Doran v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-04-03· cited 15×
- State v. John PowersSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-10-14· cited 7×
- Holder v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-04-03· cited 3×
- Bartholomew v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-05-22· cited 3×
- State of Delaware v. Otis Phillips and Jeffrey Phillips.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-09-03
- State of Delaware v. Taylor.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-11-23
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-09-29
- State v. MaldonadoSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-11-23
- State v. LandSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-01-24
- Sierra and Rodriguez v. DSCYFSupreme Court of Delaware· 2020-08-17
- Lloyd v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-03-26
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 1,102×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 734×
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-02-21· cited 430×
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
- Enrique Ortiz Cervantes v. Bill Walker, Superintendent, Banning Road CampNinth Circuit· 1979-01-26· cited 177×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1967-03-27· cited 126×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-03· cited 118×
- United States v. James L. ConleyFourth Circuit· 1985-12-18· cited 110×
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-07-12· cited 104×
- United States v. Jesus Mata-AbundizNinth Circuit· 1983-10-04· cited 97×
- United States v. Anthony John Romanello, Victor Antonio Mendez and Gerald Thomas VertucciFifth Circuit· 1984-02-17· cited 85×
- People v. DaughertyIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 76×
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-01-02· cited 61×
- Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1978-05-09· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.