· 12/18/1985
United States v. James L. Conley
Citations
- 779 F.2d 970
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that an individual, such as a prisoner, would “always accurately perceive that his ultimate freedom of movement is absolutely restrained” and requiring additional police action in order to trigger the need for the administration of Miranda warnings
- prisoner in handcuffs and full restraints in conference area awaiting medical treatment not in custody
- prisoner in handcuffs and full restraints in conference area awaiting medical treatment not in custody
- where inmate was taken to conference area primarily to await medical treatment when incriminating statements were made
- inmate questioned while handcuffed in small conference room in prison “control center,” where he was awaiting transfer to the infirmary for medical treatment needed following the altercation
- inmate questioned while handcuffed in small conference room in prison “control center,” where he was awaiting transfer to the infirmary for medical treatment needed following the altercation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell, Phillips, Mur-Naghan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.