Skip to main content
· 12/18/1985

United States v. James L. Conley

Citations

  • 779 F.2d 970
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an individual, such as a prisoner, would “always accurately perceive that his ultimate freedom of movement is absolutely restrained” and requiring additional police action in order to trigger the need for the administration of Miranda warnings
  • prisoner in handcuffs and full restraints in conference area awaiting medical treatment not in custody
  • prisoner in handcuffs and full restraints in conference area awaiting medical treatment not in custody
  • where inmate was taken to conference area primarily to await medical treatment when incriminating statements were made
  • inmate questioned while handcuffed in small conference room in prison “control center,” where he was awaiting transfer to the infirmary for medical treatment needed following the altercation
  • inmate questioned while handcuffed in small conference room in prison “control center,” where he was awaiting transfer to the infirmary for medical treatment needed following the altercation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Phillips, Mur-Naghan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.