Bowyer v. Hi-Lad, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]f a jury awards punitive damages to a litigant, a circuit court must carefully review the jury’s verdict”
• [T]here is nothing to indicate that the [insured’s] actions were intended to cause humiliation.”
• “Finally, the appellant has not been exposed to punitive damages, criminal sanctions, or excessive litigation expenses as a result of its misconduct, all factors which might merit a reduction by the circuit court of a punitive damage award as specified in Syllabus Point 4 of Games.”
• \The financial position of the defendant is relevant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).