Horace Mann Insurance v. Leeber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sexual abuse upon a minor amounts to intentional rather than negligent conduct in the context of interpreting an insurance policy “intentional injury” exclusion,
• observing that presumption of intent was supported by doctrine of reasonable expectations with respect to policyholder and homeowners insurance carrier
• finding no duty to defend against sexual misconduct claims where policy contained intentional acts exclusion
• intent to injure inferred as a matter of law in sexual misconduct case involving a teacher's sexual conduct with student
• intent to injure inferred as a matter of law in sexual misconduct case involving a teacher's sexual conduct with student
• “ ‘This policy does not apply to liability ... caused intentionally by or at the direction of any insured[.]’” (emphasis added) (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).