Skip to main content
· 6/25/1999

Riffe v. Home Finders Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 517 S.E.2d 313
  • 205 W. Va. 216
  • 1999 W. Va. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he interpretation of an insurance contract, including the question of whether the contract is ambiguous, is a legal determination that, like a lower court’s grant of summary judgment, shall be reviewed de novo on appeal.”
  • holding that “[t]he interpretation of an insurance contract, including the question of whether the contract is ambiguous, is a legal determination that, like a lower court’s grant of summary judgment, shall be reviewed de novo on appeal”
  • question of whether a contract is ambiguous constitutes a legal determination subject to de novo review upon appeal
  • “The interpretation of an insurance contract, including the question of whether the contract is ambiguous, is a legal determination . . . .”
  • “The interpretation of an insurance contract, including the question of whether the contract is ambiguous, is a legal determination[.].”
  • “The interpretation of an insurance contract, including the question of whether the contract is ambiguous, is a legal determination[.].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.