Skip to main content

Phillips v. State

Citations

  • 984 So. 2d 503
  • 2008 WL 731897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s ability to plan and cover-up the murder was inconsistent with a finding of deficient adaptive functioning
  • concluding that the defendant’s ability to plan and cover-up the murder was inconsistent with a finding of deficient adaptive functioning
  • holding that a trial court’s order finding a lack of a deficit in adaptive behavior was supported by competent, substantial evidence of the defendant’s strengths that refuted the defendant’s purported limitations
  • holding that a trial court's order finding a lack of a deficit in adaptive behavior was supported by competent, substantial evidence of the defendant's strengths that refuted the defendant's purported limitations
  • deferring to the trial court’s determination that the state’s expert, who testified the defendant was malingering, was more credible than the defendant’s expert, who did not test the defendant for malingering
  • “As the trial court found, ‘there was no evidence [t]o support the Defendant’s contention that his poor , grades were a result of mental retardation.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.