Weiman v. Weiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “that a party has sufficient funds to pay the attorney does not preclude an award for counsel fees”
• \that a party has sufficient funds to pay the attorney does not preclude an award for counsel fees\
• under General Statutes § 46b-82, providing that court \ 'shall consider' \ enumerated factors in determining whether to award alimony, \[t]he court is not obligated to make express findings on each of the statutory criteria\
• $10,000 attorney's fees award to wife proper when trial court \could reasonably have concluded that [her] financial resources ... were necessary to meet her future needs\ and alimony awarded to her \was not substantial in amount nor was it for a long period of time\
• $10,000 attorney’s fees award to wife proper when trial court ‘‘could reasonably have concluded that [her] financial resources . . . were necessary to meet her future needs’’ and alimony awarded to her ‘‘was not substantial in amount nor was it for a long period of time’’
• $10,000 attorney’s fees award to wife was proper when trial court ‘‘could reasonably have con- cluded that [her] financial resources . . . were neces- sary to meet her future needs’’ and alimony awarded to her ‘‘was not substantial in amount nor was it for a long period of time’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).