Skip to main content

O'Brien v. O'Brien

Citations

  • 161 A.3d 1236
  • 326 Conn. 81
  • 2017 WL 2703941
  • 2017 Conn. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ‘‘a distribution ratio of 78 percent to 22 percent is not, on its face, excessive,’’ and observing that ‘‘we have upheld distributions awarding as much as 90 percent of the marital estate to one party’’
  • explaining that court has discretion to impose remedial financial order so long as its value does ‘‘not exceed the reasonable value of the injured party’s losses’’
  • even in absence of finding of contempt, trial court has broad discretion to issue remedial orders
  • trial court had discretion to remedy plaintiff's violations of court order through distribution of marital property
  • ‘‘[t]he court’s enforcement power is necessary to ‘preserve its dignity and to protect its proceedings’ ’’
  • trial court can take into account, ‘‘when dividing the parties’ assets, whether a party had engaged in a dissipation of those assets’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Palmer, McDonald, Espinosa, Robinson, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.