Skip to main content
· 9/4/1997

Boone v. Oy Partek Ab

Citations

  • 724 A.2d 1150
  • 1997 Del. Super. LEXIS 483
  • 1997 WL 1054103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant shipped up to 50 tons per month of asbestos into Delaware over ten years, resulting in a \persistent course of conduct in this State” from which defendant \derived substantial revenue”
  • noting that Justice O’Con-nor’s analysis has been adopted in Delaware
  • describing the analysis, this Court stated that it needs “to determine whether there is an intent or purpose on the part of the manufacturer to serve the Delaware market with its product.”
  • “When a manufacturer passes title to goods to a third party outside of Delaware, it is not deemed to have performed an act in this State.”
  • “When a manufacturer passes title to goods to a third party outside of Delaware it is not deemed to have performed an act in this State.”
  • “Specific jurisdiction is at issue when the plaintiff’s claims arise out of acts or omissions that take place in Delaware.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Babiarz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.