Skip to main content
· 9/6/1991

Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.

Citations

  • 772 F. Supp. 1458
  • 21 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1721
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12352
  • 1991 WL 179653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subsection (c)(1) of the Delaware long-arm statute “requires that some act must have actually occurred in Delaware.”
  • holding that subsection (c)(1) of the long-arm statute “requires that some act must have actually occurred in Delaware”
  • stating that courts will ignore corporate boundaries under the alter ego theory where “fraud or inequity is shown”
  • under the agency theory, “only the precise conduct shown to be instigated by the parent is attributed to the parent”
  • under the agency theory, “only the precise conduct shown to be instigated by the parent is attributed to the parent”
  • in applying Delaware’s long-arm statute, the court may consider actions of an agent to the extent they were directed and controlled by the principal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.