LaNUOVA D & B, SpA v. Bowe Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the transaction of business only supports jurisdiction “with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct.”
• explaining that the transaction of business only supports jurisdiction “with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct.”
• explaining that the transaction of business only supports jurisdiction “with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct”
• explaining that the transaction of business only supports jurisdiction “with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct.”
• explaining that the transaction of business only supports jurisdiction “with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct.”
• explaining that the “single act” provisions of Section 3104 “supply the jurisdictional basis for suit only with respect to claims which have a nexus to the designated conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-03-23· cited 205×
• Hercules Inc. v. Leu Trust & Banking (Bahamas) Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-08-20· cited 101×
• Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.
  D. Delaware· 1991-09-06· cited 88×
• Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1996-07-10· cited 87×
• Boone v. Oy Partek Ab
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1997-09-04· cited 86×
• Werner v. Miller Technology Management, L.P.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-02-13· cited 54×
• Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2008-04-11· cited 52×
• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears Plc
  D. Delaware· 1990-07-24· cited 44×
• TriStrata Technology, Inc. v. Emulgen Laboratories, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2008-02-25· cited 40×
• Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2009-04-03· cited 32×
• Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1986-12-04· cited 26×
• Kloth v. Southern Christian University
  D. Delaware· 2007-07-16· cited 26×
• Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2001-10-09· cited 25×
• Phunware, Inc. v. Excelmind Group Ltd.
  D. Delaware· 2015-07-30· cited 24×
• Marnavi S.p.A. v. Keehan
  D. Delaware· 2012-10-25· cited 24×
• Round Rock Research LLC v. Asustek Computer Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2013-08-20· cited 24×
• Hornberger Management Co. v. Haws & Tingle General Contractors, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2000-08-24· cited 21×
• Robert Bosch LLC v. Alberee Products, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2014-09-29· cited 19×
• Wright v. American Home Products Corp.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2000-04-20· cited 18×
• Belden Technologies, Inc. v. LS CORP.
  D. Delaware· 2009-06-17· cited 18×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Moore v. Little Giant Industries, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1981-05-14· cited 42×
• Waters v. Deutz Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-05-11· cited 27×
• Wilmington Supply Co. v. Worth Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1980-12-24· cited 23×
• Speakman Co. v. Harper Buffing MacH. Co., Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1984-03-20· cited 10×