Boluk v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Court will “not reevaluate the relative strength of the evidence presented to the immigration judge” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that this Court’s review “does not extend to the underlying factual determination”
• \we do not reevaluate the relative strength of the evidence presented to the immigration judge\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The amount of weight to be accorded any particular fact raises no question of law and is accordingly not within this Court’s jurisdiction to review... .”
• agency properly attached significance to evidence that alien and spouse apparently never shared finances, lived together only briefly, and divorced quickly as evidence that marriage was fraudulent
• evidence of lack of shared marital life goes toward showing a sham marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).