Ibrahimi v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “whether the IJ properly applied the law to the facts” in determining eligibility for good faith marriage waiver is a “legal question” over which courts retain jurisdiction
• determining that jurisdiction exists only to evaluate a “predicate legal question” in a challenge to an immigration judge’s finding that a marriage was not entered in good faith (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reviewing whether the BIA correctly found an alien statutorily ineligible for a good-faith-marriage waiver
• reviewing whether the BIA correctly found an alien statutorily ineligible for a good-faith-marriage waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).