Adams v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the government’s argument that the pro se applicant failed to exhaust an issue before the BIA where the applicant “implicitly made the point” through another argument and the BIA decided the issue
• “Upon realizing the drug conviction was not final for purposes of the INA in light of a pending appeal, DHS amended the Notice to Appear . . . .”
• “Upon 14 realizing that the drug conviction was not final for purposes of the INA in light of 15 a pending appeal, DHS amended the Notice to Appear . . . .” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).