Klemm v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f the conflict is merely potential ... then with full disclosure to an informed consent of both clients there may be dual representation”
• “a purported consent to dual representation of litigants with 26 adverse interests at a contested hearing would be neither intelligent nor informed”
• desirability of independent legal advice to avoid risk of civil liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).