Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/11/2010
Bloome v. Haverly
Citations
- 154 Wash. App. 129
- 225 P.3d 330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a homeowner's personal belief as to the scope and meaning of a view covenant was inadmissible extrinsic evidence
- holding that a homeowner’s personal belief as to the scope and meaning of a view covenant was inadmissible extrinsic evidence
- holding that a homeowner's personal belief as to the scope and meaning of a view covenant was inadmissible extrinsic evidence
- contrasting case from past cases that had found that issuance of a declaratory judgment was proper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dwyer, Grosse, Lau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Newport Yacht Basin v. Supreme NorthwestCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-07· cited 63×
- Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-07· cited 59×
- Pasado's Safe Haven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-25· cited 23×
- Riverview Community Group v. Spencer & LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-14· cited 8×
- Saunders v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28· cited 8×
- Thaddeus C. Pritchett v. Picnic Point Homeowners AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-19· cited 3×
- Schlotfeldt v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-22· cited 1×
- Vernon Meyers & Virginia Meyers v. Reginald Saunders & Elizabeth SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28
- Barney M. Yorkston, Jr. & Carollyn D. Yorkston, Apps./x-resps. v. Whatcom County, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-01-21
- Gull Industries, Inc., Pet/cross-resp V. Granite State Insurance, Resp/cross-petCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-23
- City Of Edmonds, V. The Edmonds Ebb Tide Assoc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-21
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 543×
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 471×
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 311×
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court· 1994-11-22· cited 302×
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 237×
- Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court· 1974-02-28· cited 202×
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 175×
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-10· cited 166×
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court· 1973-09-27· cited 165×
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1993-07-15· cited 159×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 151×
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 142×
- Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 138×
- Trimble v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-24· cited 128×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MontoyaWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-22· cited 89×
- Estate of Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 86×
- Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-05· cited 79×
- Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-05· cited 78×
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 71×
- First United Methodist v. Hearing ExaminerWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.