Newport Yacht Basin v. Supreme Northwest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the context rule applies to a “discrete subset of cases interpreting railroad right-of-way interests”
• noting that the context rule applies to a “discrete subset of cases interpreting railroad right-of-way interests”
• noting Washington Supreme Court has declined to use extrinsic evidence for unambiguous deeds outside the context of railroad right-of-way disputes
• describing elements of equitable estoppel with regard to actions by parties (quoting Kramarevckv v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 122 Wn.2d 738, 743, 863 P.2d 535 (1993)
• “Because Arizona’s public policy favors arbitration to obtain a speedy 27 28 1 and inexpensive disposition of a dispute, judicial review of an arbitration award is severely 2 limited by statute.”
• \To constitute laches there must not only be a delay in the assertion of a claim but also some change of condition must have occurred which would make it inequitable to enforce it.'\ (quoting Waldrip v. Olvmpia Oyster Co.. 40 Wn.2d 469, 477, 244 P.2d 273 (1952))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).