Skip to main content
· 11/1/1990

ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.

Citations

  • 799 P.2d 250
  • 115 Wash. 2d 506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that violation of fire code provision relating to construction of floors and ceilings could breach implied warranty
  • holding that claimed violations of the fire code might affect habitability and must survive summary judgment
  • explaining that Washington courts do not separately consider negligence 13 claims presented in the garb of nuisance
  • affirming summary judgment on nuisance claim, “where the alleged nuisance is the result of the defendant’s alleged negligent conduct, rules of negligence are applied.”
  • fraudulent concealment cause of action requires, inter alia, that “a careful, reasonable inspection on the part of the purchaser would not disclose the defect”
  • builder-vendors of residential dwellings impliedly warranted that the homes they constructed complied with applicable building code requirements, were built in a workmanlike manner, and were suitable for habitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.