Skip to main content

Blankenship v. State

Citations

  • 365 S.E.2d 265
  • 258 Ga. 43
  • 1988 Ga. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 10.1 of the Georgia Uniform Rules for the Superior Courts, 253 Ga. 823-824, when party failed to object to trial court’s excusing certain jurors
  • applying Rule 10.1 of the Georgia Uniform Rules for the Superior Courts, 253 Ga. 823-824, when party failed to object to trial court's excusing certain jurors
  • not addressing the excusal of two jurors about which the defendant had not objected at trial
  • appellant’s failure to object to the court’s ruling on whether two jurors were qualified constituted waiver under Rule 10.1
  • “Failure to object to the court’s ruling on whether or not a juror is qualified shall be a waiver of any such objection.”
  • rule not enforceable until presentation of evidence has begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.