Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 9/15/2008

Blankenship v. Hall

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 1253
  • 2008 WL 4191952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining “implicit findings of fact are entitled to deference under USCA11 Case: 23-10786 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 05/06/2025 Page: 44 of 72 44 Opinion of the Court 23-10786 § 2254(d) to the same extent as explicit findings of fact”
  • “Significant deference is owed to failures to investigate made under a client’s specific instructions not to involve his family.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Hull, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Blankenship v. Hall

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.