John Angus Wright v. Sec. For the Dept. of Correc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the summary nature of a state court’s decision does not lessen the deference that it is due” under AEDPA
• concluding that state court’s summary denial of claim is considered an adjudication on the merits for purposes of § 2254(d)(1)
• concluding that the state court’s summary denial of a claim is considered an adjudication on the merits for purposes of § 2254(d)(1)
• concluding that a state court’s summary denial of a claim is considered an adjudication on the merits for purposes of § 2254(d)(1)
• concluding that state court’s summary denial of claim is considered an adjudication on the merits for purposes of § 2254(d)(1)
• concluding that state court’s summary denial of a claim is considered an adjudication on the merits for purposes of § 2254(d)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).