Ted Herring v. Secretary, Department of Correction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Ajrguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.”
• “As we repeatedly have admonished, arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.”
• “As we repeatedly have admonished, arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.”
• “As we have repeatedly admonished, arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.”
• “[A]s [the Eleventh Circuit] repeatedly ha[s] ’admonished, ‘[a]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.’ ”
• “[A]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before a reviewing court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).