Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that jail credit claims are cognizable in rule 3.850 motions “if the defendant is requesting additional jail credit due to factual matters not ascertainable from the trial court’s records” (quoting Blake v. State, 807 So.2d 772, 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))
• “[I]n order for a court to enhance a defendant’s sentence based on section 775.087(2), the grounds for enhancement must be clearly charged in the information.” (citing Adams v. State, 916 So. 2d 36, 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-13· cited 17×
• Yegge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-15· cited 8×
• Hope v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-31· cited 4×
• Vanderren Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-25
• Senter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-24
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-06· cited 29×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 23×
• Blake v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-20· cited 23×
• Whitehead v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-16· cited 14×
• Gill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 10×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-18· cited 9×
• Adams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-07· cited 7×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 4×