McKnight v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where defendant claimed he voluntarily canceled his bond on one charge after being arrested and jailed on another charge, evidentiary hearing would be necessary, so rule 3.800(a) review was not appropriate
• addressing allegation that defendant was entitled to additional jail credit \because he voluntarily canceled his bond on one charge while he was serving jail time on other unbonded charges\
• defendant’s claim that he was entitled to additional credit for jail time because he voluntarily cancelled his bond on one charge while he was serving jail time on other unbonded charges required an evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blake v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-20· cited 23×
• Decoste v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-08· cited 4×
• Hawks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Albano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-20· cited 1×