E.D. Pennsylvania· 1/25/2007
Blain v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
Citations
- 240 F.R.D. 179
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5460
- 2007 WL 178564
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the inquiry as to the adequacy of the class definition is subsumed in the Rule 23(a) analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Savage
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Powers v. Lycoming EnginesE.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-09-25· cited 32×
- Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamE.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
- Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.E.D. New York· 2014-05-09· cited 20×
- Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityE.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-08-31· cited 14×
- Kallman v. AronchickE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-11-08· cited 10×
- Powers v. Lycoming EnginesE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-02-09· cited 8×
- White ex rel. Estate of McCullough v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.W.D. Michigan· 2008-03-06· cited 5×
- De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Rasa Floors, LPE.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-08-20· cited 1×
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Baby Neal v. CaseyThird Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Second Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 411×
- Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-07· cited 398×
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyThird Circuit· 1998-11-12· cited 337×
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Third Circuit· 1992-12-02· cited 252×
- CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-02· cited 220×
- Beck v. Maximus, Inc.Third Circuit· 2006-08-04· cited 201×
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Third Circuit· 1991-04-23· cited 185×
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncThird Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 178×
- Margaret L. Johnston v. Hbo Film Management, Inc.Third Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 170×
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 162×
- Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-08-30· cited 142×
- Edward C. LeJEUNE; Deborah LeJeune, Appellants, v. BLISS-SALEM, INC.; E.W. Bliss Company; General Electric Co., AppelleesThird Circuit· 1996-03-19· cited 131×
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-10-27· cited 123×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.