White ex rel. Estate of McCullough v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he hypothetical limitation of only short, simple instructions is, therefore, not inconsistent with either jobs requiring GED level 2 or 3 reasoning”
• holding that the “hypothetical limitation of only short, simple instructions” is not inconsistent with jobs requiring a reasoning level of two or three
• finding that the ALJ did not err in relying upon VE testimony based on “reliable statistical sources as well [as] personal knowledge and experience”
• finding that the ALJ did not err in relying upon VE testimony based on “reliable statistical sources as well personal knowledge and experience’’
• finding that the ALJ did not err in relying upon VE testimony based on “reliable statistical sources as well personal knowledge and experience”
• finding that an APRN “does not fall within the category of ‘acceptable medical sources’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).