E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/9/2011
Powers v. Lycoming Engines
Citations
- 272 F.R.D. 414
- 2011 WL 504786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that where the subject matter of the contract is mobile — and not a stationary object such as land or a building — “the location of the subject matter of the contract has been determined to be the location of the subject matter on the day of delivery”
- “Thirty-one states. . . do not require privity of contract to recover for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability where only economic damages are involved.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Savage
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jarrett v. Panasonic Corp. of North AmericaE.D. Arkansas· 2013-06-21· cited 13×
- Toll v. TannenbaumE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-11-15· cited 9×
- Long v. FAIRBANK FARMS RECONSTRUCTION CORP.D. Maine· 2011-10-25· cited 4×
- Steel Dynamics Columbus, LLC v. Altech Environment USA Corp.N.D. Mississippi· 2017-03-31· cited 2×
- Derick Ortiz, v. Sig Sauer, Inc.D. New Hampshire· 2023-02-10
Cites
101 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationThird Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1996-02-15· cited 761×
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-10-14· cited 758×
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court· 1981-03-02· cited 549×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Third Circuit· 2007-03-15· cited 257×
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1978-10-05· cited 230×
- CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-02· cited 220×
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-11· cited 208×
- Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 189×
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Third Circuit· 1991-04-23· cited 185×
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncThird Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 178×
- Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-22· cited 145×
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-24· cited 137×
- Edward C. LeJEUNE; Deborah LeJeune, Appellants, v. BLISS-SALEM, INC.; E.W. Bliss Company; General Electric Co., AppelleesThird Circuit· 1996-03-19· cited 131×
- Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-27· cited 123×
- Featherall v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1979-03-02· cited 109×
- Riordan v. BarneyE.D. Illinois· 1986-11-06· cited 105×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.