Biogen Idec, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing prosecution history disclaimer, including that qualifying statements “can take the form of either amendment or argument”
• An applicant “can challenge an examiner’s characterization [of the claims] in order to avoid any chance for disclaimer.... ”
• \[T]he entirety of a patent's file history captures the public record of the patentee's representations concerning the scope and meaning of the claims.\
• “[T]he entirety of a patent’s file history captures the public record of the patentee’s representations concerning the scope and meaning of the claims.”
• “Our cases make clear, however, that where found, prosecution history disclaimer can overcome the presumption of claim differentiation.”
• “Our cases make clear, however, that where found, prosecution history disclaimer can overcome the presumption of claim differentiation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-05-11· cited 148×
• In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2015-07-08· cited 133×
• Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-09-26· cited 91×
• Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-01-31· cited 64×
• Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco Partnership
  Federal Circuit· 2015-02-12· cited 63×
• SkyHawke Technologies, LLC v. Deca International Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-07-15· cited 38×
• Technology Properties Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-03-03· cited 35×
• Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. At&t Mobility, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2019-08-12· cited 30×
• Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-03-03· cited 28×
• Ajinomoto Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
  Federal Circuit· 2019-08-06· cited 25×
• Data Engine Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2021-08-26· cited 20×
• Blackbird Tech LLC v. Elb Electronics, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-07-16· cited 14×
• On Track Innovations Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-04-03· cited 8×
• Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2025-03-21· cited 6×
• UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.
  E.D. Virginia· 2015-07-30· cited 4×
• Kranos Ip Corp. v. Riddell, Inc.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-09-12· cited 4×
• Rates Technology Inc. v. Broadvox Holding Co.
  S.D. New York· 2014-01-28· cited 2×
• N5 Technologies LLC v. Capital One N.A.
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-10-29· cited 1×
• Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2017-01-12· cited 1×
• Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
  D. Delaware· 2017-06-30· cited 1×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)
  Federal Circuit· 2004-08-11· cited 753×
• Seachange International, Inc. v. C-Cor, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-06-29· cited 205×
• Elkay Manufacturing Co. v. Ebco Manufacturing Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-09-15· cited 197×
• Computer Docking Station Corp. v. Dell, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 122×
• Elekta Instrument S.A. v. O.U.R. Scientific International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-06-01· cited 120×
• Grober v. Mako Products, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-07-30· cited 106×
• Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Cook Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-22· cited 91×
• 3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2004-01-20· cited 89×
• Salazar v. Procter & Gamble Company
  Federal Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 60×
• Epistar Corp. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-22· cited 54×
• O1 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Logmein, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-07-31· cited 51×
• Regents of University v. Dakocytomation California, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-02-28· cited 49×
• Acco Brands, Inc. (Doing Business as Kensington Technology Group) v. Micro Security Devices, Inc. (Doing Business as Pc Guardian)
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-07· cited 35×
• Sorensen v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2005-10-31· cited 30×