Acco Brands, Inc. (Doing Business as Kensington Technology Group) v. Micro Security Devices, Inc. (Doing Business as Pc Guardian)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the examiner's Reasons for Allowance made \clear that the examiner and the applicant understood\ what was changed and what the invention required
• construing the asserted claims consistent with the examiner’s reasons for allowance where the examiner simply reiterated “the arguments that the patentee had presented”
• relying on comments made in an Examiner's Statement for Reasons of Allowance to limit claim scope because \in this case the examiner simply repeated the arguments that the patentee had presented\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).