Federal Circuit· 7/8/2015
In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
Citations
- 793 F.3d 1268
- 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1425
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11714
- 2015 WL 4097949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming Board’s construction of “integrally attached” to mean “discrete parts physically joined together as a unit without each part losing its own separate identity”
- “IPRs proceed in two phases. In the first phase, the PTO determines whether to institute IPR. In the second phase, the Board conducts the IPR proceeding and issues a final decision.” (citations omitted)
- “Although Garmin’s peti- tion with respect to claim 17 included the grounds on which the PTO instituted review, the petition did not list Evans and Wendt for claim 10 or Wendt for claim 14.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Clevenger, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 322×
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-07-09· cited 108×
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalFederal Circuit· 2017-10-04· cited 97×
- Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-11-29· cited 88×
- In Re Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 65×
- Trivascular, Inc. v. SamuelsFederal Circuit· 2016-02-05· cited 55×
- Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics CorporationFederal Circuit· 2016-02-10· cited 52×
- Sightsound Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-12-15· cited 50×
- PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLCFederal Circuit· 2016-02-22· cited 47×
- Harmonic, Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-03-01· cited 46×
- Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-03-23· cited 46×
- Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V.Federal Circuit· 2021-03-12· cited 44×
- Sas Institute, Inc. v. Complementsoft, LLC.Federal Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 43×
- Genzyme Therapeutic Products Ltd. Partnership v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-06-14· cited 40×
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LpFederal Circuit· 2016-01-13· cited 37×
- Merck & Cie v. Gnosis S.P.A.Federal Circuit· 2015-12-17· cited 35×
- Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-09-30· cited 29×
- Straight Path Ip Group, Inc. v. Sipnet Eu S.R.O.Federal Circuit· 2015-11-25· cited 28×
- Bradium Techs. LLC v. Andrei IANCUFederal Circuit· 2019-05-13· cited 27×
- McM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyFederal Circuit· 2015-12-02· cited 26×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,381×
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 967×
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 958×
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 935×
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 634×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court· 1979-01-16· cited 536×
- Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Federal Circuit· 2008-07-14· cited 191×
- In Re Jerre M. FreemanFederal Circuit· 1994-07-12· cited 157×
- In Re Baxter International, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-05-17· cited 133×
- In Re Yujiro Yamamoto, and Dictaphone Corp., IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1984-08-07· cited 112×
Other cases named In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.