O1 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Logmein, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering statements made during reexamination as intrinsic evidence for purposes of claim construction
• “[T]he disclosures that facilities may be subdi- vided . . . support a construction that the location facility may be distributed among multiple physical computers.”
• “As a general rule, the words ‘a’ or ‘an’ in a patent claim carry the meaning of ‘one or more.’” (citation omitted)
• “As a general rule, the words ‘a’ or ‘an’ in a patent claim carry the meaning of ‘one or more.’” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he disclosures that facilities may be subdi- vided . . . support a construction that the location facility may be distributed among multiple physical computers.”
• “The patent’s use of words such as ‘a,’ ‘its,’ and ‘the’ in the claims is insufficient to limit the meaning of ‘locator server computer’ to a single physical computer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).