Skip to main content

Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 55 N.Y.2d 571
  • 436 N.E.2d 182
  • 450 N.Y.S.2d 776
  • 22 A.L.R. 4th 171
  • 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding use of concerted action theory in DES case where defendant did not object
  • upholding use of concerted action theory in DES case where defendant did not object
  • “Products liability law cannot be expected to stand still where innocent victims face inordinately difficult problems of proof.”
  • modified version of concert of action in a DES case was allowed to be submitted to a jury when the manufacturers took part in “conscious parallel” conduct
  • because DES manufacturer made no motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, “concerted action” theory became controlling law of case
  • because DES manufacturer made no motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, \concerted action\ theory became controlling law of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.