Skip to main content
· 7/12/1988

Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and Company

Citations

  • 851 F.2d 418
  • 271 U.S. App. D.C. 163
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9315
  • 1988 WL 70700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that under Maryland law there was no cause of action based on alleged concert of action
  • noting that “[t]he most important consideration guiding the exercise of this discretion . . . is whether the reviewing court finds itself genuinely uncertain about a question of state law . . .”
  • allowing court to assume choice of law was correct since neither party raised the issue
  • “We must apply the law of the forum as we infer it presently to be, not as it might come to be.”
  • allowing DES claim to proceed under Massachusetts law
  • permitting analysis of claims under laws of two states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.