Jasco Tools, Inc. v. Dana Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[c]onfidential proprietary data relating to pricing, costs, systems, and methods are 4 protected by trade secret law”
• opining that “the various discovery methods are more complementary than fungible” and “[n]o one type of discovery is necessarily an adequate substitute for another”
• noting that “propriety data relating to pricing, costs, systems, and methods” is a trade secret
• concluding jury could infer substance of phone calls from timing and pattern
• moving party entitled to summary judgment where nonmoving party failed to make sufficient showing on essential element of her case on which she bore burden of proof
• “Of course, the fact that their denials were self-serving does not mean that such testimony would not be admissible at trial . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).