Beyond Nuclear v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding 7 this requirement met when “A–Z knew that its intentional acts would have an impact on 8 Washington Shoe and it knew that Washington Shoe had its headquarters in the state of 9 Washington”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).