Town of Winthrop v. Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when an agency is faced with an “area of research ... still developing,” it is not arbitrary and capricious to decline to take action while “evaluating] the issue more fully”
• “[I]t was not arbitrary and capricious for the FAA to conclude that it had enough data to make a reasoned decision. There will always be more data that could be gathered; agencies must have some discretion to decide when to draw the line and move forward with decisionmaking.”
• \[I]t was not arbitrary and capricious for the FAA to conclude that it had enough data to make a reasoned decision. There will always be more data that could be gathered; agencies must have some discretion to decide when to draw the line and move forward with decisionmaking.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).