Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the \use of differential language in various sections of the same statute is presumed to be intentional and deserves interpretive weight\
• “Congress’s use of differential language in various sections of the same statute is presumed to be intentional and deserves interpretive weight.”
• \Congress's use of differential language in various sections of the same statute is presumed to be intentional.\
• “It is a bedrock principle that a court may only uphold an administrative action on a rationale advanced by the agency in the administrative proceeding.”
• “The principle is clear that Congress’s use of differential language in various sections of the same statute is presumed to be intentional and deserves interpretive weight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).