Fourth Circuit· 4/8/2003
Beskind v. Easley
Citations
- 325 F.3d 506
- 116 A.L.R. 5th 665
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The question is not whether North Carolina can advance its regulatory purpose by imposing fewer burdens on in-state wineries than out-of-state wineries.... Rather, the question is whether discriminating in favor of in-state wineries ... serves a Twenty-first Amendment interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dickerson v. BaileyFifth Circuit· 2003-06-26· cited 43×
- Swedenburg v. KellySecond Circuit· 2004-02-12· cited 16×
- Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC v. HudginsW.D. Kentucky· 2006-12-26· cited 13×
- Heald v. EnglerSixth Circuit· 2003-08-28· cited 10×
- Bolick v. DanielsonFourth Circuit· 2003-05-29· cited 8×
- American Petroleum Institute v. CooperE.D. North Carolina· 2010-01-26· cited 4×
- Huber Winery v. WilcherW.D. Kentucky· 2006-08-21· cited 2×
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchnorfN.D. Illinois· 2010-09-03· cited 1×
- Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of GreensboroM.D. North Carolina· 2006-07-25· cited 1×
- BlueHippo Funding, LLC v. McGrawS.D. West Virginia· 2009-02-25· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 2003-05-23
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court· 1994-04-04· cited 799×
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 690×
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 661×
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 606×
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 585×
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 579×
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 481×
- Dennis v. HigginsSupreme Court· 1991-02-20· cited 452×
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. HealySupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 291×
- Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSupreme Court· 1939-11-13· cited 257×
- North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 227×
- TFWS, Inc. v. SchaeferFourth Circuit· 2001-03-01· cited 50×
- Russell Bridenbaugh v. Karen Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 49×
- Beskind v. EasleyFourth Circuit· 2003-04-08· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.