Fourth Circuit· 3/1/2001
TFWS, Inc. v. Schaefer
Citations
- 242 F.3d 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “Battipaglia has not been followed elsewhere” and concluding that it was “obvious” that “agreements to adhere to previously announced prices are unlawful per se”
- court must draw all rational factual inferences in non-movant’s favor in deciding summary judgment motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eastern, Hilton, Luttig, Michael, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2015-09-15· cited 332×
- TFWS, Inc. v. FranchotFourth Circuit· 2009-07-15· cited 246×
- US Airways, Inc. v. O'DONNELLTenth Circuit· 2010-12-03· cited 78×
- Strawser v. AtkinsFourth Circuit· 2002-05-22· cited 47×
- Antrican v. OdomFourth Circuit· 2002-05-09· cited 38×
- Martin v. TaftS.D. Ohio· 2002-09-19· cited 30×
- Mt. Hood Beverage Co. v. Constellation Brands, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-02-20· cited 27×
- TFWS, Inc. v. SchaeferFourth Circuit· 2003-03-31· cited 25×
- Spec's Family Partners, Ltd. v. Executive DirectorFifth Circuit· 2020-08-25· cited 23×
- Beskind v. EasleyFourth Circuit· 2003-04-08· cited 21×
- Bolick v. RobertsE.D. Virginia· 2002-03-29· cited 12×
- Dickerson v. BaileyS.D. Texas· 2002-07-17· cited 6×
- Conn Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. SeagullSecond Circuit· 2019-02-20· cited 6×
- TFWS, Inc. v. SchaeferD. Maryland· 2002-02-04· cited 4×
- Connecticut Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. HarrisD. Connecticut· 2017-06-06· cited 4×
- Beskind v. EasleyW.D. North Carolina· 2002-04-05· cited 3×
- Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Orland Fire Prot. Dist.E.D. Illinois· 2018-08-02· cited 3×
- Tfws v. SchaeferFourth Circuit· 2003-03-31· cited 2×
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. MalengNinth Circuit· 2008-01-29· cited 2×
- TFWS, Inc. v. SchaeferD. Maryland· 2004-04-30· cited 2×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 3,788×
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 1,967×
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,730×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,375×
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 1,372×
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,218×
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 855×
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 776×
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 703×
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 658×
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 635×
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 606×
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 481×
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Supreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 296×
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.Supreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 243×
- Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 229×
Other cases named TFWS, Inc. v. Schaefer
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.