Bernard v. Char

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting objective standard for determining whether patient would have undergone treatment had they been informed of the risk of the harm that in fact occurred
• finding no malpractice where radiologist met the standard of care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 101×
• Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.D
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 53×
• Ashe v. Radiation Oncology Associates
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1999-12-27· cited 36×
• Barcai v. Betwee
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 30×
• Ketchup v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-01-19· cited 27×
• O'Grady v. State.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-06-07· cited 23×
• Ray v. KAPIOLANI MEDICAL SPECIALISTS
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 21×
• In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
  D. South Carolina· 2017-01-03· cited 19×
• Barbee v. Queen's Medical Center
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-09-30· cited 17×
• Bynum v. Magno
  D. Hawaii· 2000-12-13· cited 9×
• Andrea M. McNair v. Eric K. Shinseki
  Veterans Claims· 2011-11-18· cited 4×
• Cuc Thi Ngo v. Queen's Medical Center
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2015-08-31· cited 3×
• Alghussein v. Kaan.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-03-25· cited 1×
• McELVANEY v. LEITE-AH YO
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2010-02-25
• Garcia v. Robinson
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2015-05-29
• Owens v. The Queen's Medical Center
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2024-11-06