Bernard v. Char

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testimony required where “lay jurors are ill prepared to evaluate complicated technical data for the purpose of determining ,.. whether there is a. causal relationship between the violation of a duty and an injury to the patient”
• noting profes- sional negligence principles apply to abstracters of title
• discussing malpractice where risks in dental procedure not disclosed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).