· 8/31/2015
Cuc Thi Ngo v. Queen's Medical Center
Citations
- 136 Haw. 54
- 358 P.3d 26
- 2015 Haw. LEXIS 213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that plaintiffs’ counsel elicited valid expert testimony from the defendant-physician regarding recognized alternative treatments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, Ayabe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.