· 3/3/1998
O'NEAL v. Hammer
Citations
- 953 P.2d 561
- 87 Haw. 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing “consulting physicians,” who are not required to obtain informed consent, from “treating,” “referring,” and “second opinion” physicians who may be so required
- defining a “second opinion physician” as one who “is called in directly by the patient to advise the patient, and not the referring doctor, about the proposed course of treatment or surgery.”
- “[W]here a physician orders a specific procedure or otherwise retains control over the treatment of the patient, the physician is subject to a duty to obtain informed consent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.