Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 4/24/1995

Bentley v. Shalala

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 784
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9266
  • 1995 WL 234963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is “ALJ’s function to resolve conflicts among the various treating and examining physicians”
  • noting that an “ALJ may reject the conclusions of any medical expert, whether hired by a claimant or by the government, if inconsistent with the medical record as a whole.”
  • discussing that an “ALJ may reject the conclusions of any medical expert, whether hired by a claimant or by the government, if [the conclusions are] inconsistent with the medical record as a whole”
  • finding the ALJ properly discredited claimant’s limitations as he attempted to return to work for his former company and applied for jobs both similar and unrelated to his previous employment
  • “Where the medical evidence is equally balanced, as we find it is here, the ALJ resolves the conflict.”
  • absence of prescription medicine, failure to seek medical treatment, claimant’s record of applying for jobs, and inconsistent medical reports was substantial evidence supporting ALJ’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, McMillian, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bentley v. Shalala

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.