Vincent D. Bowman v. Railroad Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearings officer&s conclusion was based on substantial evidence where he considered VE&s testimony and claimant&s specific characteristics in concluding claimant could perform other work
• hearings officer's conclusion was based on substantial evidence where he considered VE's testimony and claimant's specific characteristics in concluding claimant could perform other work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).