Charles E. HAJEK, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “[b]ased on these statements [regarding “evidence as a whole,” ”symptoms,” and “impairments”], we believe the ALJ properly considered 7 the combination effects of Hajek’s impairments”
• dismissing claim that the ALJ committed error by failing to discuss statements regarding the side effects of medications where “there was no evidence that he ever mentioned these side effects to his physicians.”
• “Taken as a whole, the claimant’s limitations from his impairments appear to restrict him to sedentary work.”
• ALJ noted that the evidence as a whole did not show claimant’s symptoms would preclude all work and, thus, properly considered the combined effects of impairments
• ALJ noted that the evidence as a whole did not show claimant’s symptoms would preclude all work and, thus, properly considered the combined effects of impairments
• ALJ properly considered the combined effects of impairments when the ALJ noted that the evidence as a whole did not show claimant’s symptoms would preclude all work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).