N.D. Ohio· 1/5/1927
Benedict v. Seiberling
Citations
- 17 F.2d 841
- 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he removing defendant may avoid remand only by 18 demonstrating that the non-diverse party was fraudulently joined.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Killits
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksThird Circuit· 1942-05-06· cited 68×
- Steinberg v. ToroD. Puerto Rico· 1951-02-26· cited 11×
- First Congregational Church & Society of Burlington v. Evangelical & Reformed ChurchS.D. New York· 1958-03-28· cited 10×
- Saalfrank v. O'DANIELN.D. Ohio· 1975-01-27· cited 6×
- Efentakis v. S/T World LegionE.D. Virginia· 1958-04-16· cited 4×
- Donovan v. Queensboro Corp.E.D. New York· 1947-11-17· cited 3×
- Moffett v. Arabian American Oil Co.S.D. New York· 1948-12-20· cited 1×
- Sterrett v. Hydro-United Tire Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1929-04-25· cited 1×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 265×
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 164×
- City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1905-03-06· cited 163×
- Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court· 1898-01-17· cited 150×
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court· 1902-02-24· cited 149×
- Williams v. NottawaSupreme Court· 1881-12-18· cited 101×
- Little v. GilesSupreme Court· 1886-11-01· cited 87×
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court· 1908-12-07· cited 68×
- Detroit v. DeanSupreme Court· 1883-01-22· cited 54×
- O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Eighth Circuit· 1909-11-15· cited 30×
- Wheeler v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court· 1913-06-10· cited 29×
- Lake County Commissioners v. DudleySupreme Court· 1899-02-20· cited 26×
- Bell & Howell Co. v. BlissSeventh Circuit· 1919-10-07· cited 22×
- Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co. v. HornEighth Circuit· 1924-05-21· cited 22×
- Cashman v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.Supreme Court· 1886-04-19· cited 19×
- Southern Realty Investment Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1909-01-04· cited 19×
- New Albany Waterworks v. Louisville Banking Co.Seventh Circuit· 1903-01-06· cited 19×
- City of Toledo v. Toledo Rys. & Light Co.Sixth Circuit· 1919-06-04· cited 18×
- Kelly v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 1923-12-19· cited 16×
- Quinlivan v. Dail-Overland Co.Sixth Circuit· 1921-07-19· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.